West overlooks that Saddam was the ultimate WMD

Thirteen years after the invasion of Iraq and the toppling of Saddam Hussein, UK, and Western media remain engrossed with the obsession that the actions of former US President George W. Bush and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair unearthed the raging bull that is visible across the Middle East today.

The much-anticipated Chilcot Report drew a damning assessment with the notion that the UK decision was based on "flawed" intelligence leading to an invasion that went "badly wrong."

The Media viewed the report with hysteria with frequent pointing to Iraq as the original sin that highlight why the Islamic State (IS) was able to rise and unleash terror and why the Middle East is engulfed in flames.

Such viewpoints since 2003 simply fail to assess and accept the bigger picture.

The Iraqi invasion has also become an excuse for the numerous Western foreign policy failings since 2003 that ultimately allowed groups such as IS to flourish.

The evidence clearly points to a misalignment of data around Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) capabilities in 2003, but why has Saddam, Iraq or the Middle East been viewed with such narrow lens and lack of real perspective?

Saddam came to power in 1979—24 years before the invasion of Iraq. He was not any ruler; he was a brutal dictator who knew how to placate and control a disparate nation.

The seeds of the deep discontent on display today in Iraq and the Middle East go well beyond 2003, the aftermath of the Arab Spring or even the birth of Saddam. The ultimate cause is that Iraq and much of the Middle East were arbitrarily thrown together to fulfill selfish imperial interests.

There may have been relative stability in southern Iraq under Saddam compared to today's mass violence and chaos, but this was due to the iron fist rule of Saddam rather than a charming and beloved leader who represented or was admired by the whole country.

Then of course, is the baffling disregard by Western critics of the Iraq war on the campaigns of genocide against the Kurds. Was the pre-2003 era really that glorious or are these so called experts picking and choosing facts to serve their arguments rather than viewing the bigger picture?

How can anyone overlook the devastating chemical bombing of Halabja in 1988, where thousands perished symbolised by mothers and fathers died on the spot holding their infants? Where even today the population and surrounding lands pay a price.

Thousands of Kurdish villages were razed in broad daylight and thousands of Kurds were confined to mass graves under the infamous Anfal campaign. Many of these mass graves have only been discovered after the overthrow of Saddam.

To those who question Saddam's capability to possess and use WMDs need to look no further than Halabja. However, the biggest WMD remains to be Saddam himself.

The Kurds have flourished remarkably under self-rule and in their dawn of freedom. Kurdistan forms a sizable portion of Iraq, so how can the successful Kurdistan model be ignored with the focus on Baghdad and the Sunni triangle that has been the hotbed of violence?

The real question is why topple Saddam in 2003? Why not when he committed such grave acts against his own population or when he launched a devastating war on Iran or when then invaded Kuwait? The simple answer is that Saddam's barbarous rule was masked as he served Western interests.

Is it really the fault of Blair and Bush that Sunnis and Shias have held centuries of animosity? Is it really their fault that Iraq, even with the advent of democracy, has been ruled by corruption, controversy and policies that have widened the ethnosectarian divide than really unite a country?

The notion that Iraq would have been a better place today if Saddam remained in power is seen through the narrow and tainted lens. No dictator can survive forever!

Yes, Middle East was more stable under Saddam and before the Arab Spring, but this was all due to a common factor – the unsustainable scenario of dictators who ruled with a strong hand.

The invasion of Iraq opened Pandora's Box. With the artificial ethnosectarian lines across the Middle East, sooner or later the locked-up devil would have been unleashed.

Bashdar Pusho Ismaeel is a London-based freelance writer and analyst, whose primary focus and expertise is on the Kurds, Iraq and Middle Eastern current affairs.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Kurdistan24.

Editing by Delovan Barwari