Saudi Arabia Intercepts Houthi Missiles as Questions Mount Over Mecca Defence Pact

Renewed Houthi attacks raise questions about the Saudi-Turkish-Pakistani alliance’s ability to protect the kingdom

Vehicles drive along a road in Mecca on October 25, 2026. (Photo: AFP)
Vehicles drive along a road in Mecca on October 25, 2026. (Photo: AFP)

ERBIL (Kurdistan24) — Saudi Arabia’s air defenses intercepted and destroyed three ballistic missiles launched by Yemen’s Houthi movement toward the kingdom’s Eastern Province, the Saudi-led coalition said Tuesday, as renewed attacks on strategic infrastructure raise questions about the alliance’s ability to shield Saudi Arabia from Houthi missile and drone strikes.

Coalition spokesman Turki al-Maliki announced the interceptions on X, describing the projectiles as missiles launched by the “terrorist Houthi militia.”

Reuters separately reported that the coalition said it had intercepted three ballistic missiles and four drones targeting Saudi Arabia’s eastern and southern regions. Saudi authorities also issued early-warning alerts before confirming that the immediate danger had passed.

The latest incident follows weeks of escalating attacks attributed to the Houthis, also known as Ansar Allah, which have targeted Saudi airports and other infrastructure.

The renewed hostilities have intensified pressure on Riyadh to strengthen its air defences and demonstrate that its regional security partnerships can protect civilian and economic assets.

Mecca pact under scrutiny

Signed in Makkah on Aug. 7 by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement commits the three countries to treating an armed attack against any one member as an attack against all.

The agreement aims to strengthen collective deterrence and expand military cooperation among the three states.

The alliance was activated for the first time on Oct. 5, when its members agreed to implement collective-defence commitments and take steps toward the rapid deployment of agreed military forces and capabilities in Saudi Arabia. The meeting followed a series of Houthi attacks on the kingdom.

However, the agreement's practical impact remains a central question. While the alliance has moved from a signed declaration to institutional coordination and plans for military deployment, the latest attacks indicate that its collective-defence framework has yet to demonstrate that it can prevent serious damage to Saudi territory and critical infrastructure.

The implementation process is also continuing. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have completed their ratification procedures, while Türkiye was still undertaking its domestic approval process as of Oct. 24, according to Pakistan's Foreign Ministry.

Reuters reported on Oct. 22 that Ankara was preparing to seek parliamentary authorization for a potential deployment of military personnel to Saudi Arabia, including specialists in air defence and electronic warfare.

These developments suggest that the alliance's immediate contribution lies in political coordination and the development of a framework for joint defence. Whether that translates into a fully operational system involving personnel, equipment, intelligence-sharing and integrated air defence remains to be seen.

Can the pact protect Saudi Arabia from the Houthis?

The distinction between intercepting missiles and preventing attacks is central to assessing the pact's effectiveness. Saudi Arabia's air defences have continued to intercept incoming projectiles, demonstrating an ability to counter at least some threats.

But successful interceptions do not, by themselves, establish that the kingdom is protected against repeated attacks or that the new alliance has materially strengthened those capabilities.

The vulnerability of Saudi infrastructure was underscored by attacks on King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh earlier this month. Saudi authorities reported that a strike on Oct. 10 killed 12 people and wounded more than 300, with the death toll subsequently rising to 13.

The attacks disrupted airport operations and contributed to widespread flight cancellations. The Houthis claimed responsibility for the airport strikes. The airport's repeated targeting exposed the potential consequences of even a limited number of successful strikes against major civilian infrastructure.

The disruption extended beyond immediate casualties, affecting travel, commercial activity and Saudi Arabia's efforts to present itself as a secure destination for international business and investment.

The attacks also came as Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces escalated their campaign against the Houthis, following the breakdown of a United Nations-brokered truce that had largely halted cross-border hostilities since 2022. The renewed fighting has increased the risks of further retaliation against the kingdom.

For Riyadh, the Mecca pact therefore faces a dual challenge: strengthening the country's capacity to intercept incoming threats while deterring the Houthis from launching them in the first place.

The first requires operational capabilities, including surveillance, interception systems and coordination among allied forces. The second depends on whether the prospect of collective retaliation changes the calculations of the group responsible for the attacks.

The agreement's broad commitment to collective defence does not, on its own, guarantee that every missile or drone will be intercepted, nor does it publicly establish a specific response to each attack.

Its practical value will depend on the capabilities the three countries deploy, how quickly they integrate their systems and what actions they are prepared to take if Saudi Arabia comes under sustained attack.

Beyond the headlines

The latest missile interceptions highlight the difference between a defence pact's political promise and its measurable security outcomes. The Mecca alliance has offered Saudi Arabia a formal commitment of mutual assistance from Türkiye and Pakistan, strengthened diplomatic coordination and a mechanism for pursuing joint military deployments. Those are significant steps, but they are not equivalent to an established collective air-defence shield.

The central question is not simply whether the alliance has been activated, but whether it can reduce the frequency and impact of successful attacks. That assessment will require evidence of operational deployments, improved interception rates, reduced damage to critical infrastructure and a sustained decline in attacks.

For now, the record is mixed. Saudi air defences have intercepted missiles, but attacks attributed to the Houthis have also caused casualties and disrupted major infrastructure.

The pact cannot yet be credited with preventing those attacks, and it is too early to determine whether its emerging military arrangements will significantly change the security balance.

The latest interceptions may demonstrate the value of existing Saudi defensive capabilities. Whether the Mecca Defence Alliance adds a meaningful layer of protection will depend on what its members deliver in practice, rather than what they have pledged on paper.